Archive for August, 2010

Understanding Anxiety and Original Sin

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

 

Understanding Anxiety

Anxiety is the experience of being both attracted to and repulsed by the same thing. Some contemporary psychologists have understood this and related anxiety to what they term ‘approach-avoidance conflicts.’… In the human situation we find ourselves being both attracted to and repulsed by the same thing. [Is this similar to the desire in children to explore the unknown, yet to be fearful of it, a sort of adventure, exploring what is strange, risking danger?]

 

The experience of anxiety gives us humans an awareness of our freedom and responsibility. It helps us see that life consists of choices. We might say that anxiety is a revelatory emotion. It reveals to us our spiritual character by signaling our freedom.

 

How did sin enter the world? How was it even possible for Adam and Eve to be tempted? God endowed them with freedom, and with freedom came fundamental anxiety. ..To turn from God is to turn away from being our true selves. Anxiety is an awareness that, though God has created me and endowed me with freedom, I can use this freedom to cut myself off from God and will my own destruction. … This possibility both repulses and attracts me. I want to will my own independence and autonomy, even if it means my own destruction. So that the answer to the question about the origin of Adam and Eve’s temptation is that it lies in freedom itself. The temptation was to lay hold of one’s freedom by declaring independence from God. God cannot create free beings to relate freely to him without conceding them this possibility.

 

Understanding Original Sin

We must understand our sinfulness in a manner that does not let us off the hook by blaming it all on Adam and Eve. Sin cannot be understood simply as an inherited physical ailment; it is a spiritual sickness. The human race is a genuine unity. Without questioning the historicity of Adam, Kierkegaard insists that in some sense Adam is every person, and in some sense every person is Adam. Every person is both himself and the race. When Adam fell into sin, he in some way embodied and represented us all. When we fall into sin, we in some way recapitulate and repeat Adam’s sin.

 

We cannot say why all human beings sin any more than we can say why Adam sinned. All we can say is that all humans do sin, and they thereby demonstrate the unity of the race. How sin came into the world, each man understands solely by himself. Each of us has to reflect on our own experience? Why have we sinned?

 

Human beings do not begin with a fresh slate. We are born with a host of sinful inclinations. We are biological creatures, and our sinfulness has shaped our natural desires. None of us can claim to have always done what we could and should; none of us can blame all our misdeeds on our environment and heredity. We put ourselves in Adam’s place. We too have a kind of innocence that we forfeit. By endorsing Adam’s choice, we are saying in effect that we would have done the same thing if we had been in Adam’s place.

 

Soren Kierkegaard’s Christian Psychology, C. Stephen Evans, pp.60-64

 

The Danger of Correct Preaching

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

 

I have just completed reading Helmut Thielicke’s collection of sermons on Genesis 1-11 entitled, How The World Began. At the end he comments on all the theological debate that swirls around the historical documents and the interpretation of the Old Testament. His approach is to speak to the needs of his contemporaries. “The hearer must be able to say after he has listened to the sermon: ‘I was in it’; perhaps also, ‘I was in it in a way that doesn’t suit me at all, because I want to think of myself in a different way, and so I feel challenged to oppose. Nevertheless, I was in it.’

 

“Dare I say something else that is very harsh?

Corrie ten Boom once said, ‘I have traveled through half the world and I have found that nowhere is there such correct preaching as in Germany, but nowhere else is it so lacking in power and authority.’

The mirror that is held up to us in this statement is inexorable. For its thesis describes a listener’s reaction which may be expressed somewhat as follows: ‘It was perfectly all right, but I wasn’t in it.’”

 

Germany, the land of Martin Luther, had many great preachers of the Bible in its churches. They were preachers who correctly interpreted the Word of God. Yet they preached academically, and failed to apply the Word to themselves and their hearers. The result was two devastating World Wars, and the Holocaust. The USA may have many fine churches and preachers, but unless we apply the Word of God to our lives, we can become indifferent to God’s truth.

 

It is possible to interpret and preach the Bible correctly, but fail to make the human connection, either in oneself or in one’s hearers. So much preaching and teaching is ‘correct’ but irrelevant. I once asked my mentor, John Stott, after he had preached a perfectly correct sermon: ‘So what?’ Together we made a pact that we would endeavor to preach sermons that were personal, relevant and applicable to our hearers.

 

I am planning a series of sermons on Genesis 1-11. I will be dealing with the most high and lofty themes, and controversial subjects, but if I fail to make each sermon apply to myself or my hearers I will have failed. The text of the Bible is about the human condition and God’s salvation. It is about me, my condition, and God’s reaching out to me. It is not an abstract text about the world in general, or the problems of my neighbor. It is about me, my problems, and my need for salvation. It is not just about Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, or even man and woman, it is about Ted Schroder. If only everyone could see its message so personally it would bring the Bible alive in an arresting way. Beyond the controversies about the interpretation of Scripture lies the necessity to let the Bible speak to us in our need. We need this truth. Our lives depend upon it.

The Eternal in Us

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

 

Insights gained from Spiritual Emotions: a psychology of Christian virtues, by Robert C. Roberts, Distinguished Professor of Ethics at Baylor University, Waco, Texas.

 

Imagination is the medium for the process of infinitizing. (Kierkegaard)

“An essential and important dimension of the human self….is that he can soar in thought beyond the immediate circumstances of his life…Humans are, as far as we know, the only animals that can be transported by a novel or a movie into another world, with its loves and hates, enchantments and terrors, cozy comforts and unnerving suspense. We alone can know, ten years in advance, that the moon will be full on a given day, or sixty years in advance, that we will one day molder in the ground. Only human life can be shaped by an ideal, such as the life of Christ, or an ideology, such as Marxism, or an obsession, like making money.” (51)

“Because of our imagination – ability and compulsion to survey our lives, to see them for what they’re worth – meaninglessness is the destiny of human consciousness, except in the context of eternity.” (55)

 

The Importance of Living in the Perspective of Eternity.

“The anxiety we feel in the face of death is the consequence of investing this life (from which we must die) with ultimate significance. The despair we feel when forced to reckon with the vanity of all our activities and pleasures is the result of our according ultimate significance to those activities and pleasures – to their being for us the whole story, or the center of the story. If we could manage to see this life as a stage in an eternal life, then it could be accepted honestly and gladly for what it is. If we could see the significance of our present activities and pleasures as deriving from a context beyond this present one of flowering and fading, they could honestly be enjoyed for what they are, no less and no more.”

 

“Christianity is, among other things, the wonderfully good news that this mortal life is not our whole story. We have been redeemed for an eternal kingdom by a Lord who is the first fruits of the resurrection from the dead. The few years we live in this present body …are a kind of pilgrimage, a sojourn, a preparatory trip on the way to something much greater. They should be understood as the school years. When we are in school we are quite clear (if we are serious students) that our central activities are directed to something beyond school…. The quality of our school life will determine, to some extent, the quality of life after school…. For the Christian, this present existence is provisional. We are aware that every activity we undertake is schooling directed toward a higher end.” (60)

 

Humanistic Resignation v. Gospel Hope.

“Bertrand Russell’s most famous essay, and one of the most widely read manifestoes of naturalistic humanism of the twentieth century, concludes with these words,

Brief and powerless is Man’s life; on him and all his race the slow, sure doom falls pitiless and dark. Blind to good and evil, reckless of destruction, omnipotent matter rolls on its relentless way; for Man, condemned to-day to lose his dearest, to-morrow himself to pass through the gate of darkness, it remains only to cherish, ere the blow falls, the lofty thoughts that ennoble his little day; disdaining the coward terrors of the slave of Fate, to worship at the shrine that his own hands have built; undismayed by the empire of chance, to preserve a mind free from the wanton tyranny that rules his outward life; proudly defiant of the irresistible that tolerate, for a moment, his knowledge and his condemnation, to sustain alone, a weary but unyielding Atlas, the world that his own ideals have fashioned despite the trampling march of unconscious power. (A Free Man’s Worship, 59)

 

 “Naturalism is the view that nature with all its processes is all there is, that there is nothing beyond it, nothing eternal, and that moral and spiritual values are inventions of the human mind doomed to perish like everything else. Russell proposes that in this meaningless, crushing physical universe where our bodies are trapped and doomed, we can satisfy our yearning for something eternal by worshipping the product of our own minds – our art, science, and philosophy, and above all, the art of tragedy… The ‘happiness’ he envisions really is resignation.”

 

“The apostle says, ‘May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace as you trust in him, so that you may overflow with hope by the power of the Holy Spirit” (Romans 15:13). If Paul had been a naturalist he might have said, ‘May the god of resignation fill you with tolerance for your destiny,’ or ‘May the benign Void enable you to quell your yearnings for eternity,’ or ‘May the god of cosmic process make you magnanimous enough to accept your absorption into his consequential nature.’ But he would not have talked about joy and peace and hope.” (149,150)

 

September at the Chapel

Sunday, August 15th, 2010

 

September is looking to be an exciting month at the Chapel. I will be back in the pulpit after my vacation. I am planning to complete my series on Second Timothy. On Sunday, September 5, I will be preaching on 2 Timothy 4:6-8, entitled ARE YOU READY? Paul’s last words to us indicated that he was ready to meet his Maker. He was about to be executed for his witness to Jesus. How ready are you and I? How can we get ready? His words are inspiring and challenging.

 

On Sunday, September 12, I will be preaching on 2 Timothy 4:9-22. In his peroration Paul mentions many of his friends and supporters by name, and also some of his enemies. On this Sunday we will be celebrating ten years of my ministry at the Chapel. It seems only yesterday that I came from San Antonio, Texas, and yet much has been accomplished which we can celebrate together. On that Sunday we will have combined worship at 10.00 a.m.

 

On Sunday, September 19, Ryan Reeves, of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in Jacksonville, will begin teaching a class at 10.30 a.m. on the Gospel of Mark. Fresh from completing his doctorate at the University of Cambridge in England, Ryan will bring enthusiasm and knowledge to share with us his insights.

 

Also, on that Sunday, I will begin a series of messages on Genesis 1-11. I have been reading on this subject for some time and I think you will enjoy the perspective I will bring to these famous first chapters of the Bible. I have just enjoyed listening to Joseph Haydn’s oratorio, The Creation, and hope that we can incorporate some parts of it into our worship.

 

On Friday, September 10, Jim Mayo, of Nassau-Baptist Hospital, will be the speaker at our Men’s Breakfast. Sign up and be there men!

 

Norm Purdue will also be teaching his class on Christian Basics at 8.00 a.m. in the Board Room. Thank you Norm.  

Faith as Possibility

Sunday, August 15th, 2010

 

Reflections on rereading The Sickness Unto Death by Soren Kierkegaard.

 

Faith in God is to believe that all things are possible.

“The decisive thing is, that for God all things are possible…..when a man is brought to the utmost extremity, so that humanly speaking no possibility exists. Then the question is whether he will believe that for God all things are possible – that is to say, whether he will believe…. to believe is precisely to lose one’s understanding in order to win God….salvation is humanly speaking the most impossible thing of all; but for God all things are possible!…For possibility is the only power to save…. The believer possesses the eternally certain antidote to despair, viz. possibility; for with God all things are possible every instant. This is the sound health of faith which resolves contradictions. The contradiction in this case is that, humanly speaking, destruction is certain, and that nevertheless there is possibility. Health consists essentially in being able to resolve contradictions.”

 

Faith in God makes it possible to pray.

“The fatalist is in despair – he has lost God, and therefore himself as well…He is unable to pray. So to pray is to breathe, and possibility is for the self what oxygen is for breathing…. The fact that God’s will is the possible makes it possible for me to pray.”

 

Christianity does not need defending.

“One sees how extraordinarily stupid it is to defend Christianity, how little knowledge of men this betrays, and how truly, even though it be unconsciously, it is working in collusion with the enemy, by making of Christianity a miserable something or another which in the end has to be rescued by a defense….To defend anything is always to discredit it. ….Yea, he who defends it has never believed in it. If he believes, then the enthusiasm of faith is…not defense, no, it is attack and victory. The believer is a victor.”

 

God is to be feared and revered, not taken lightly.

“Paganism generally uttered the name of God with great solemnity, with a certain horror, with a dread of the mysterious, whereas in Christendom the name of God is surely the word which occurs most frequently in daily speech and is absolutely the word to which one attaches the least meaning and uses most carelessly, because this poor revealed God (who was so imprudent and unwise as to become revealed instead of keeping Himself hidden as superior persons always do) has become a personage all too well known by the whole population, to whom one renders an exceedingly great service by going once in a while to church.”