Archive for July, 2011

John Stott 1921-2011

Wednesday, July 27th, 2011

I have just received word from England that John Stott died this afternoon. An old friend, George Cassidy, retired bishop of Southwell, emailed that John’s secretary, Frances Whithead, his niece, Caroline Stott, his former study assistant, Matthew Smith and Philip Herbert were with him. They read a few Psalms and his breathing became very shallow and he slipped away. George commented: “End of an era; and gratitude to God for his wonderful life!”

Antoinette and I were hoping to visit him later this year in his nursing home. He celebrated his 90th birthday in April, and was very frail. He was ready and eager to go on to be with the Lord he so loved and served.

In his commentary on 2 Timothy: Guard the Gospel, John wrote these words on chapter 4, verses 6-8:

“The apostle uses two vivid figures of speech to portray his coming death, one taken from the language of sacrifice and the other (probably) of boats. First, ‘I am already on the point of being sacrificed.’ Or ‘Already my life is being poured out on the altar.’ He likens his life to a libation or drink offering. So imminent does he believe his martyrdom to be that he speaks of the sacrifice as having already begun. He goes on: ‘the time of my departure has come’. ‘Departure’ (analysis) seems to have become a regular word for death, but we need not necessarily conclude from this that its metaphorical origin had been entirely forgotten. It means ‘loosing’ and could be used either of striking a tent or of ‘release from shackles’, or of untying a boat from its moorings. The last is certainly the most picturesque of the three possibilities. The two images then to some extent correspond for the end of this life (outpoured as a libation) is the beginning of another (putting out to sea). As the anchor is weighed, the ropes are slipped, and the boat is about to set sail for another shore.” (p.113)

            After further exposition of having fought the good fight, finished the race, and kept the faith, John concludes.

“This then is ‘Paul the aged’…His little boat is about to set sail. He is eagerly awaiting his crown….Our God is the God of history….He buries his workmen, but carries on his work. The torch of the gospel is handed down by each generation to the next. As the leaders of the former generation die, it is all the more urgent for those of the next generation to step forward bravely to take their place….We cannot rest forever on the leadership of the preceding generation. The day comes when we must step into their shoes and ourselves take the lead. That day had come for Timothy. It comes to us all in time.” (p.116)

            I owe more than I can tell to John Stott. He took a callow youth as his assistant and mentored him, then launched me into ministry. Over the years he kept in touch by letters and visits. His books have been a constant inspiration. My testimony can be echoed by hundreds or thousands of others all over the world.

Thank you Lord, for the privilege of knowing him personally and for being recipient of his brotherly affection and fatherly care. May his legacy continue to bear fruit. May his influence grow. May he ever be remembered as the Prince of Preachers of his day, and the friend of believers of all races throughout the world.

“My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirit’s power, so that your faith might not rest on men’s wisdom, but on God’s power.” (1 Cor.2:5)

Individuality, Conscience and Law

Thursday, July 21st, 2011

The final chapter of David Mamet’s fascinating manifesto, “The Secret Knowledge”, is worth sharing with all who have concerns about this country. Born of Jewish immigrants, raised in the Hyde Park area of Chicago, and a successful screenwriter and playwright, Mamet has experienced an epiphany about liberty and political correctness. This is his passionate word and witness.

“America is a Christian country. Its Constitution is the distillation of the wisdom and experience of Christian men, in a tradition whose codification is the Bible.

I will not say this Christian country has been good to the Jews, for this suggests an altruism or acceptance, neither of which exist. But America has been good for the Jews, as it has been, eventually, good for every immigrant group whether fleeing oppression, seeking prosperity, or, indeed, brought here in chains. The result of a 230-year-long experiment is the triumph of Judaeo-Christian values. We have created peace and plenty for more citizens over a greater period of time than that enjoyed by any other group in history.

This triumph is not due to altruism, nor to empathy, nor to compassion, but to adherence to those practicable, rational rules for successful human interaction set out in the Bible.

These rules and precepts amount, in their totality, as much to a legal philosophy as to a theology.

Practically, they assert the existence of God not as a magical force, making all men good (all men are not good), but as the a priori condition of human interaction: accountability. This irreducible understanding, which is the basis of Judaeo-Christian civilization, is that all human beings possess both a conscience and that free will necessary to allow them to either reject its dictates or to formulate them into habit. It is the codification of this conscience as Law, which allows us to adjudicate between both its conflicting claims, and its absence or presence in differing individuals.

The laws, derived from the Bible, and finding their most demonstrably perfect form in the Constitution, assert not man’s perfection, but his imperfectability, and thus, the inevitability of conflict.

Our Judaeo-Christian teachings acknowledge conflict (between individuals, between them and the State, between them and God) and proceed to suggest (through narrative in the Old and through parable in the New Testament) mechanisms for its most peaceful resolution.

This tradition does not refer, overtly or by implication, to any possible perfect state of Man or of his associations, but, rather, acknowledges his weakness both before his imperfections and before that Power, however named, which gave him both a conscience, and the desire for law.

This power may be understood as metaphysical and called God, or as a mere cosmic accident, gifting the human species with a unique formation of intellect impelling them to create Law as the most obviously utilitarian path toward effective civilization.

The Bible is an acknowledgement of human individuality. Human society has thrived historically, as we see in our diverse society, because of the liberty to exploit a random distribution of talents, flaws, and proclivities.

Those States which have, in the name of productivity, racial purity, or, indeed, equality, attempted to limit human individuality have reverted from the civilization of the Judaeo-Christian state to savagery; for they have rejected the teachings of the Bible. One need not say they died because they rejected God; they died because they rejected reason.”

Mamet goes on to say that those who engage in a state of wish-fulfillment – a state of ‘belief’ in the power of various experts who claim to be able to cure all our problems by their solutions – think that government is Good and more government is Better. “But the opposite is apparent both to anyone who has ever had to deal with Government, and, I think, to any dispassionate observer.

It is in sympathy with the first and in the hope of enlarging the second group that I have written this book.”

I commend this book to all who are looking for a contemporary analysis of our current affairs. He scratches where I itch!

Answered Prayer

Tuesday, July 19th, 2011

Dennis Lennon, writing in “Fuelling the Fire: Fresh Thinking on Prayer”, on answers to prayer.

“The most helpful approach to ‘prayer for healing’ I’ve encountered recently was at the Community of the Holy Name in Derby. Sister Lilias is herself confined to a wheelchair yet conducts a remarkable prayer-ministry for the sick who come in to her regular meetings. At each gathering she explains that God could answer prayer in any of four ways.

  1. He can, and he will, heal you tonight.
  2. or he may say ‘I will heal you but later. There are things going on in your life that must be dealt with first.’;
  3. or his answer to you may be, ‘My grace is sufficient for you’;
  4. or he may tell you, ‘I’m preparing you for death.’ (Sister Lilias commented on the remarkable interest people show in this fourth possibility, as if it is a liberation to be allowed ‘officially’ to embrace the possibility of death.)

Destiny

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011

I have just completed reading Leo Tolstoy’s classic, War and Peace. It was like feasting at a fifty course banquet. There is so much more in the novel than could ever be captured in the movie version. Apart from the innumerable characters, and the historical events it covers, War and Peace, is full of the author’s reflections upon the meaning of life and the search for purpose and fulfillment.

 I was impressed by the character of the commander-in-chief of the Russian army, Kutuzov, who embodied, for Tolstoy, the people of Russia. His motto was Patience and Time. He was willing to let Napoleon and the invading forces under his command destroy themselves rather than waste the lives of his own soldiers. He resisted the desires of his commanders to seek glory by launching attacks on the retreating French army. He was content to let General Winter do his work. So often in life we are tempted to force issues rather than let them take their own course. We think we are doing God’s work for him rather than let him work out his purposes. Patience and Time are two virtues we find difficult to accept. We want results too soon.

 Throughout the work (Tolstoy does not call it a novel) there are reflections on Destiny. In his Second Epilogue Tolstoy philosophizes on what causes such vast movements of men from west to east and then from east to west. He argues that it cannot be just because Napoleon was a genius and people obeyed him. Nor does he think that it was the result of the ideas of liberty, fraternity and equality spawned by the French revolution. Neither does he think that it was caused by new economic and trade issues. He discusses whether we have free will, or whether all these movements are determined, and we are dependent upon some predestination. He even has some interesting things to say about God and evolution. Nothing that we argue about today is anything new. In the end he believes that we are all dependent on forces that are beyond us, just as the planet on which we live is dependent upon the place it occupies in the solar system. We are not aware of the rotation of the earth, and yet it is happening as we speak. Similarly we are not aware of our dependence upon the forces of history. We are called to act morally, using our free will, but we are also predestined by God, or fate, or circumstances, to fulfill our destiny. We are called to love God and one another in whatever way we can. In that way we discover the mystery and beauty of life.

 After taking several weeks to read War and Peace, I read in one day Erik Larsen’s new book, In the Garden of the Beasts: Love, Terror, and an American Family in Hitler’s Berlin. Larsen has taken the lives of William E. Dodd and his family to tell the story of the beginnings of Hitler’s rise to power. Dodd was appointed by FDR as the American ambassador to Germany in 1933. Through his, and his daughter’s eyes, we learn of the intrigues and the terror of the Nazi machine and what it did to Germany. It also reveals the anti-Semitism of the Roosevelt administration, American society at the time, and particularly the State Department. There was a great deal of naiveté, denial, and just plain cowardice at play.

 Of course, it is easy for us retrospectively to see these things, and to feel superior to the contemporaries. It reminds us that, when we are in the midst of such movements of history we do not see how blind we are to the forces controlling us and others. How would we have behaved? Would we have been as blind and obtuse and they were? Probably. Most of us refuse to believe the worst of people. Dodd’s biggest problem was that, as an academic (he was professor of history at the University of Chicago), he believed in people working together in a rational fashion. But Hitler was irrational. Reason only takes us so far. The forces of evil stalk the earth and finds ready hosts to inhabit, whether they are the Nazi leadership or Napoleon.

It makes me wonder what is happening today that I cannot see? Am I too sanguine about world events? Is there more evil in our political leadership at home and abroad than I am willing to admit? Are the forces that are controlling the history of our period leading us to yet another time of terror? I am not given to histrionics but I sometimes wonder whether we have too many Neros’ fiddling away while Rome burns. President Roosevelt was not willing to come out and condemn Hitler’s detestable acts. Dodd’s successor in Berlin was Hugh Wilson who emphasized the positive aspects of Nazi Germany and carried on a one-man campaign of appeasement. He accused the American press of being ‘Jewish controlled’ and praised Hitler.

Are there parallels today in our refusal to condemn the evils of foreign leaders, and to play down the precarious state of government debt here and in Europe? Will the house of cards come tumbling down around us as our culture becomes more immoral, and marriage and family disintegrates? Is all this predestined, as the Bible warns us?

 Philip Yancey writes: “Biblical history tells a meandering, zigzag tale of doglegs and detours. God’s plan unfolds like a leisurely opera, not a Top 40 tune. For those of us caught in any one phrase of the opera, especially a mournful phrase, the music may seem unbearably sad. Onward it moves, at deliberate speed, and with great effort. The very tedium, the act of waiting itself, works to nourish in us qualities of patience, persistence, trust, gentleness, compassion – or it may do so, if we place ourselves in the stream of God’s movement on earth… Faith calls us to trust in a future-oriented God…No matter how circumstances appear at any given moment, we can trust the fact the God still rules the universe. The divine reputation rests on a solemn pact that one day all shall be well.”  (Prayer: Does It Make Any Difference? p.238)

Gamblers

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

I am reading with great interest The Secret Knowledge: On the Dismantling of American Culture, by playwright, screenwriter, film director and essayist, David Mamet. He takes on all the key political and cultural issues of our times, from religion to political correctness to global warming. With great insight and humor he reveals that, indeed, the emperor is wearing no clothes. As our politicians dither in Washington about doing something to reduce our national debt and to restore our creditworthiness as a nation, Mamet makes the following unforgettable analogy.

 “Most Victorian novels featured the stock character of the profligate son. He was a gambler, and having run through his inheritance, was constantly appealing to his father to pay his ever renewed gambling debts.

The father inevitably paid, ‘for the honor of the family.’ And he paid wringing his hands and cursing his fate. And the son thanked the father, wept, swore to reform, and continued gambling.

Why not, as there was, to him, no cost?

He had been taught, by his father, that there was no penalty for losing.

What worse lesson for a gambler?

For, if losing is cost free, why bother either to (a) learn to gamble or (b) to quit?

The serious gambler learns young, and painfully, that he must control his impulses, that he must not pursue fantasy, neither wish for the cards to turn, but learn the odds and husband his resources for those times when the cards or dice do favor him.

There is a technical term for the gambler who can neither learn nor quit: he is called a sucker.

Our politicians, left and right, are, to belabor the metaphor, the wastrel son: they are free to spend, to chase fantasies, and to squander resources, for the resources are not theirs, and there is no penalty for their misuse or loss.

The wastrel gambles, at no cost, for the thrill it provides; the wastrel politician does so in pursuit of fantasy (good works), or money. The money may be in direct support for his campaigns, or in free decorating of his summer home, or it may be issued in the form of plaques recognizing his good works, which plaques, on his retirement from office, may be traded in for money.” (p.52)

 “The borrower is servant to the lender.” (Proverbs 22:7) Whom are we servant to? China?

It is noteworthy that state governments have succumbed to the promotion of gambling to finance their ever increasing expenditures. It is pathetic to see poor people spending their wages on lottery tickets and one-armed bandits at the expense of their families. Such is the example our politicians are setting us. In the state of Florida lotteries were introduced by the politicians on the excuse that money was needed for education! What an education they are giving our children! Do I sense a certain hypocrisy here?

Unanswered Prayer

Saturday, July 2nd, 2011

Phil Yancey in Prayer: Does It Make Any Difference? struggles with unanswered prayer.

“Some, but not all, unanswered prayers trace back to a fault in the one who prays. Some, but not all, trace back to God’s mystifying respect for human freedom and refusal to coerce. Some, but not all, trace back to dark powers contending against God’s rule. Some, but not all, trace back to a planet marred with disease, violence, and the potential for tragic accident. How then, can we make any sense of unanswered prayer?” (p.232)

 After exploring many avenues to understand unanswered prayer Yancey concludes his chapter….”the only final solution to unanswered prayer is Paul’s explanation to the Corinthians: ‘For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as I am known.’ No human being, no matter how wise or how spiritual, can interpret the ways of God, explain one miracle and not another, why an apparent intervention here and not there. Along with the apostle Paul, we can only wait, and trust.” (p.247)